Objective/Milestone |
Plan Year |
Activity/Steps |
Resources/Materials |
Status Check |
Outcome |
Identify roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders involved in creating digital content |
1 |
|
See list that follows chart.
|
|
List of roles and responsibilities per stakeholder.
|
Revise/review roles and responsibilities as needed
|
2-5 |
|
List of roles & responsibilities |
|
Revised listing of roles/responsibilities per stakeholder
|
Review process for captioning videos |
1-5 |
|
Current process History of cost |
|
Approved process Approved funding |
Objective/Milestone |
Plan Year |
Activity/Steps |
Resources/Materials |
Status Check |
Outcome |
Establish modes of communication designed to raise awareness of EIT accessibility to all University personnel who |
1-5 |
1. President discusses EIT initiative as part of State of the College address and ties it to community engagement |
Dates for each event
|
|
Evidence that information was shared such as |
Objective/Milestone |
Plan Year |
Activity/Steps |
Resources/Materials |
Status Check |
Outcome |
develop, select, and maintain electronic information |
|
|
Prepared message for these events from EIT Coordinators
|
|
agenda, handouts, video recording, etc.
|
Develop resources regarding adoption of accessible textbooks accessibility
|
1 |
|
|
Website/handout for faculty
|
|
Establish process/procedures of communication about accessibility of digital content to student with disabilities
|
1 |
|
Student Accessibility Services Academic Affairs/Deans & Associate Deans
Chief Diversity Officer |
|
Memo from Academic Affairs for communication of syllabus statement Documentation of communication to faculty and students from SAS |
Objective/Milestone |
Plan Year |
Activity/Steps |
Resources/Materials |
Status Check |
Outcome |
Identify training resources specific to digital accessibility
|
1-5 |
Identify specific modules from Deque University that address content creation and gather pricing information
|
Deque University Evaluation tool
|
|
List of modules
Communication to campus about specific modules |
Evaluate accessibility training
|
2-5 |
Create an evaluation tool based on campus needs to ensure the best training resources for the campus
|
Evaluation tool/survey of resources Faculty/staff feedback on Deque Resources |
|
Report from evaluation |
Develop repository of digital accessibility resources
|
1-5 |
|
Staffing Platform |
|
Name of person/position responsible for accessibility training & resources
Repository and resources |
Identify funding needed to support accessible content within the departments
|
1-5 |
|
|
|
List of faculty from each department
|
Objective/Milestone |
Plan Year |
Activity/Steps |
Resources/Materials |
Status Check |
Outcome |
|
Develop a plan to monitor compliance
|
1 - 5 |
1. 2. 3.
|
Procure accessibility testing tool within LMS Renew license each year Identify how reports can/should be utilized for continuous improvement, training opportunities, etc. for data driven decision making |
Funding Ally Reports
|
|
Purchase of compliance tool
Funding source allocated
Report of how reports will be utilized within yearly evaluation of how the data was used and what decisions were made with the data |
Revise annual report to include faculty reporting and analysis of ALLY accessibility results
|
1-2 |
1. 2. |
Discussion with Academic Affairs and Institutional Effectiveness for Annual Report Communicate new portion of annual reporting |
Annual Reports Resources for faculty on Ally report |
|
Faculty reports that include Ally score |
Develop procedures/process for handling digital accessibility content complaints
|
1-2 |
1. |
Discussion with Student Accessibility Services for how students should make a complaint and how that complaint will be communicated with appropriate people involved (faculty member, person responsible for training faculty) |
Website Student Accessibility Services Dean of Students Associate Deans Chief Diversity Officer |
|
New website Documented process |
Objective/Milestone |
Plan Year |
Activity/Steps |
Resources/Materials |
Status Check |
Outcome |
|
|
|
2. Update https://suny.buffalostate.edu/acce ssibility
|
|
|
|
What are the challenges/barriers to Digital Content: Digital Content Accessibility Standards (DCAS) plan implementation?
Outreach & Education: The campus typically tends to be primarily focused and engaged in building and delivering course content. While pedagogy is extremely important, some may tend to overlook accessibility due to lack of awareness and/or lack of technological skills to deliver accessible digital content. Additionally, accessibility workshops have been poorly attended due to time constraints and challenges created by the pandemic.
Maintaining Consistency in Accessibility Across Multiple Departments: Creating a consistent message of accessibility across multiple departments and including all stakeholders has been difficult.
Time & Resources: The pandemic has created multiple challenges that has made it difficult to identify the status of accessible course material. Additionally, creating a baseline of accessibility for course materials has been difficult during remote phases of work.